Home  |  About JAPTR |  Editorial board  |  Search |  Ahead of print  |  Current issue  |  Archives |  Submit article  |  Instructions  |  Subscribe  |  Advertise  |  Contacts  |Login 
Users Online: 205   Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
     

 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 20-26  

Proniosomal gel-mediated topical delivery of fluconazole: Development, in vitro characterization, and microbiological evaluation


1 Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy (Girls), Al-Azhar University; Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts, Cairo, Egypt
2 Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy (Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt
3 Department of Pharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boys), Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

Date of Web Publication12-Feb-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Maha Khalifa Ahmed Khalifa
Department of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy (Girls), Al-Azhar University, Cairo
Egypt
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/japtr.JAPTR_332_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

The aim of this study was to explore the potential of proniosomal gel for topical delivery of fluconazole, an antifungal drug used in fungal infections caused by pathogenic fungi. Fluconazole-loaded proniosomal gels were prepared by the coacervation phase separation method using different nonionic surfactants (spans and tweens). The prepared fluconazole proniosomal gels were evaluated for various parameters such as particle size (PS), drug entrapment efficiency percentage (EE%), and in vitro drug release. The experimental results showed that the EE% for the prepared formulae are acceptable (85.14%–97.66%) and they are nanosized (19.8–50.1 nm) and the diffusion from the gels gave the desired sustaining effect. F4, which was prepared from span 60, tween 80 (1:1), and cholesterol showed highest EE% and gave slow release (40.50% ± 1.50% after 6 h), was subjected to zeta potential (ZP) test, transmission electron microscopy as well as microbiological study. The results showed a well-defined spherical vesicle with sharp boundaries with good physical stability of fluconazole within the prepared gel. Moreover, F4 showed an excellent microbiological activity represented by a greater zone of inhibition (5.3 cm) compared to control gel (fluconazole in 2% hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) gel formula) (4.2 cm) and plain gel with no drug (0 cm) against Candida albicans. This study showed the suitability of the proniosomal gel in attaining the desired sustainment effect for topical delivery of fluconazole for the management of fungal infection. The physical stability study showed that there was no significant change in EE%, PS, and ZP of fluconazole proniosomal gel after storage for 6 months.

Keywords: Antifungal drugs, fluconazole, proniosomal gel, provesicular drug delivery system


How to cite this article:
Abu El-Enin AM, Khalifa MA, Dawaba AM, Dawaba HM. Proniosomal gel-mediated topical delivery of fluconazole: Development, in vitro characterization, and microbiological evaluation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2019;10:20-6

How to cite this URL:
Abu El-Enin AM, Khalifa MA, Dawaba AM, Dawaba HM. Proniosomal gel-mediated topical delivery of fluconazole: Development, in vitro characterization, and microbiological evaluation. J Adv Pharm Technol Res [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Sep 24];10:20-6. Available from: http://www.japtr.org/text.asp?2019/10/1/20/252125




  Introduction Top


Fluconazole is a first-generation triazole antifungal medication. It differs from earlier azole antifungals (such as ketoconazole) in that its structure contains a triazole ring instead of an imidazole ring.[1] The imidazole antifungals are mainly used topically; however, fluconazole and certain other triazole antifungals are used for systemically treatment because there are safe drugs and have good oral absorption.[2],[3] It acts by interacting with lanosterol14-α demethylase, a cytochrome P-450 enzyme necessary to convert lanosterol to ergosterol, as ergosterol is an essential component of the fungal cell membrane. The inhibition of its synthesis results in increased cellular permeability causing leakage of cellular content.[4] Vesicular drug delivery systems using colloidal particulate carriers, such as liposomes or niosomes, have distinct advantages over conventional dosage forms. Proniosomal gels are structurally similar to liposome and niosome having a bilayer; however, the materials used to prepare proniosomes make them more stable and offer many more advantages over liposome and noisome.[5] Proniosomes reduce the physical stability problems of niosomes such as leaking, fusion, and aggregation and provide additional convenience in transportation, distribution, storage, and dosing.[6] Proniosomes can entrap both lipophilic and hydrophilic drugs either in aqueous layer or vesicular membrane and present low toxicity because of their nonionic nature.[7] Proniosomes are dry formulations of that can be measured as needed and rehydrated by brief agitation in hot water.[8]


  Materials and Methods Top


Materials

Fluconazole was provided as a gift sample from Sedico, Egypt. Spans (20 and 60) were purchased from Al-Rowad Chemicals 6th of October, Egypt. Tween 80 was purchased from Sedico, Egypt. Cholesterol extrapure was purchased from Mekkawy chemicals (Giza, Egypt). Ethanol was purchased from Delta Company for chemical industries, Egypt. All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and obtained from El-Nasr Company for Pharmaceutical Chemicals, Cairo, Egypt.

Methods

Formulation of fluconazole proniosomal gels

Proniosomes were prepared using coacervation phase separation method[9] with some modifications using different surfactants from Span and Tween series, for topical application. The composition of different proniosomal formulations is summarized in [Table 1]. In a beaker, the surfactant and cholesterol were mixed with 0.5 ml of absolute ethanol, and then 50 mg of fluconazole was added. Then, the beaker was covered with a lid to prevent the loss of solvent and the beaker was warmed in a water bath (55°C–60°C) for 5 min while shaking until the complete dissolution of cholesterol. Then, about 0.16 ml of hot distilled water (55°C–60°C) was added while warming in the water bath for 3–5 min till a clear or translucent solution was produced.[10] The mixture was allowed to cool at room temperature until the dispersion was converted to gel. The obtained gels were stored in the same closed beaker for further characterization.
Table 1: Composition of different fluconazole proniosome formulations

Click here to view


Evaluation of the prepared formulations

Organoleptic properties

Proniosomal gels were characterized for appearance, color, and homogeneity by visual inspection.

Optical microscopy

One drop of the formed gel was spread on a glass slide and examined for the vesicle structure using ordinary light microscope with varied magnification powers (×10 and ×40).[11] Photomicrographs were taken using a digital camera (Sony Cybershot DSCw55 7.2 megapixel, Tokyo, Japan).

pH measurement

The pH of the gel was determined by digital pH meter (Model 420, ORION, USA). A sample of 0.1 g of gel was dissolved in 10 ml of distilled water and the electrode was then dipped into gel formulation and constant reading was noted.[12] The readings were taken for an average of three times.

Determination of drug entrapment efficiency

A sample of 0.2 g of proniosomal gel was taken in a glass tube, and 10 ml of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) was added. This aqueous suspension was sonicated in a sonicator bath (Rolex, India), followed by centrifugation at 9.000 rpm at 20°C for 30 min (Ultra centrifuge 5417R, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The supernatant was collected and assayed by using ultraviolet (UV) method (Shimadzu UV spectrophotometer (2401/PC), Japan) for unentrapped fluconazole content at 260 nm.[11] The percentage of drug encapsulation (entrapment efficiency percentage [EE%]) was calculated by the following equation:

EE% = (Total amount of drug − Unentrapped drug/Total amount of drug) ×100.

In vitro release study

The release of fluconazole from proniosomal gels was determined using membrane diffusion technique. The proniosomal gel equivalent to 25 mg of fluconazole was placed in a glass tube having a diameter 2.5 cm with an effective length of 8 cm that was previously covered with soaked osmosis cellulose membrane with a molecular weight cutoff 12,000 Daltons, which acts as a donor compartment. The glass tube was placed in a beaker containing 100 ml of phosphate buffer pH 5.5, which acts as a receptor compartment. The whole assembly was fixed in such a way that the lower end of the tube containing gel was just touched (1–2 mm deep) the surface of diffusion medium. The temperature of receptor medium maintained at 37°C ± 100°C, and the medium was agitated at 100 rpm speed using magnetic stirrer. Aliquots of 3 ml sample were withdrawn periodically and replaced with equal volume to maintain the volume constant of the receptor's phase. The collected samples were analyzed for the drug containing at 260 nm absorbance against a reagent using the UV spectrophotometer.[13]

Particle size analysis of fluconazole proniosomes

The particle size (PS) and Polydispersity Index (PDI) of proniosomes were measured using a Zeta sizer 3000 PCS (Malvern Instr., England) equipped with a 5 mW helium–neon laser with a wavelength output of 633 nm. Measurements were made at 25°C, angle 90, and runtime at least 180 s.[14] The proniosomal gels were appropriately diluted with distilled water before measurements. PDI was determined as a measure of homogeneity. Small values of PDI (<0.1) indicate a homogeneous population, while PDI values >0.3 indicate high heterogeneity.[15]

Zeta potential analysis

Charge on drug-loaded vesicles surface was determined using zeta potential (ZP) analyzer (A Brookhaven Instrument Corp). Analysis time was kept for 60 s, and average ZP and charge on the proniosome preparation after hydration with phosphate buffer saline pH 7.4 were determined at 25°C and three runs were carried out.[16]

High-resolution transmission electron microscopy

The selected and prepared fluconazole proniosomal gel was characterized for its shape by transmission electron microscopy (JEOL Model - JEM 2100–200KV, Tokyo, Japan), using a 300 mesh carbon-coated copper grid and phosphotungstic acid (1%; w/v) as a negative stain. After being stained, the samples were allowed to dry at room temperature for 10 min for investigation.[17]

Physical stability studies

The selected fluconazole proniosomal gel (F4) was evaluated for their stability by storing and sealing in well-closed containers in the refrigerator at 4°C ± 1°C for 6 months. The stability study was performed according to different parameters, including physical appearance, %EE, PS, and ZP.[13] The changes of %EE, PS, and ZP against storage time were monitored.

Microbiological study of fluconazole proniosomal gel

The in vitro antifungal efficacy of fluconazole pronisomal gel was determined by performing agar-cup diffusion assay.[18] The assay was performed using cultures of Candida albicans (ATCC 60193) (0.1%), in Sabouraud dextrose agar. The strain was inoculated in sterile 0.85% NaCl tube in a ratio of 1:9. The culture was subjected to further dilution in a sterile 0.85% NaCl to get 106 CFU/ml. Sterile swab was dipped into the culture suspension and then placed on the edge of the agar plate and moved across to the other sides. Cups were made in the seeded agar plates of 6-mm diameter.[19] Cups were filled with 0.5 ml of the proniosomal gel and an equivalent weight of control and plain gel. The  Petri dish More Detailses were then incubated at 37°C. The effectiveness of the prepared gel was compared with plain gel contains 0% of fluconazole and the control. The zones of growth inhibition were measured for all the tested samples. Each type of samples was tested in triplicate. The inhibition zone of growth of C. albicans was measured in mm after 48 h and the mean inhibition zone was then calculated.[20]

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis of the results was performed using one-way analysis of variances to determine the significance of differences between groups; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


  Results and Discussion Top


Organoleptic properties

The physical appearance results are shown in [Table 2]. It was found that the formulae 1, 4, 6, and 7 were white creamy gel; formula 2 was viscous gel; formula 3 was pale yellow gel; and the formulae 5, 8, and 9 were pale yellow viscous gel.
Table 2: The entrapment efficiency percentage, particle size, Polydispersity Index, and physical appearance of fluconazole in different proniosomal gels

Click here to view


Optical microscopic examination

The photomicrograph of fluconazole (F4) is shown in [Figure 1]. It showed the presence of homogenous population of vesicles with spherical shape.
Figure 1: Microscopical examination of proniosomal gel F4

Click here to view


pH measurement

The pH of proniosomes was in the acceptable limits for topical application as they were ranged from 5.2 to 6.9 as shown in [Table 2].

Fluconazole entrapment efficiency in proniosomes

The entrapment efficiency of fluconazole in different proniosomal gels is summarized in [Table 2]. F4 and F1 prepared using span 60 and tween 80 (1:1) and span 60 alone showed the highest entrapment efficiency (97.66% and 93.37%, respectively). From these results, it was found that formulations containing span 60 alone showed higher entrapment efficiency than formulations containing span 20 and tween 80. The formulation containing tween 80 alone showed the least entrapment efficiency. This can be explained by many facts as follows:

  1. The hydration temperature used to make niosomes should usually be above the gel–to-liquid phase transition temperature of the system that results in niosomes that are less leaky and have high entrapment efficiency.[21] Span 60 has highest phase transition temperature (50°C) and entrapment efficiency % as compared to both span 20 and tween 80[22]
  2. The longer alkyl chain influences the hydrophilic lipophilic balance (HLB) value of the surfactant mixture which in turn directly influences the drug entrapment efficiency.[23] The lower the HLB of the surfactant, the higher will be the drug entrapment efficiency and stability as in the case of proniosomes prepared using span 60[24]
  3. This could also be attributed to the structure, orientation, and packing behavior of the surfactants. Span 60 has longest saturated chain length and shows highest entrapment.[25]


Zeta potential and particle size results

Proniosomes (F4) that contain fluconazole, cholesterol, span 60, and tween 80 (1:1) as surfactants were subjected to appropriate dilution using ionized water where niosomes are derived and its dispersion was detected utilizing the ZP analyzer. ZP was found to be-32.9 mV with a negative charge. Wen et al. stated that the high value of ZP (more than ± 30 mV) showed greater repulsion between charged particles, therefore, reducing aggregation or flocculation and electrically stabilized the colloidal particles.[26] Junyaprasert et al. obviated that the preferential adsorption of hydroxyl ions at the vesicle surface was responsible for the negative surface charge of vesicles made from nonionic surfactants.[27]

The result showed a good physical stability of the fluconazole within the prepared gel was obtained, as ZP increased, also the repulsion between the vesicles has increased which prevent their reaggregation and provided electrical stability of the system.[28],[29] The PS of all the prepared pronisomal gel was in the nanosize range (19.80–50.12 nm). The vesicles were discrete and separate with no aggregation or agglomeration [Figure 2]. It was observed that the vesicles were smaller with the presence of span 60 as compared to tween 80 alone (F1–F3). As the ratio of span 60 increased in the formulation (F4, F6, and F7), the vesicle size also decreased followed by span 20 (F5, F8, and F9) which is in an agreement to the findings of Pankaj et al.[30] Alsarra et al. have reported that spans are more hydrophobic, so as to minimize its surface free energy, it forms smaller vesicles, whereas tweens are hydrophilic; hence, the water intake of these bilayers increased and resulted in larger niosomes.[25]
Figure 2: Transmission electron micrograph of fluconazole-loaded proniosome (F4)

Click here to view


In vitro release of fluconazole from proniosomal gel

[Figure 3] showed that the rate of release of fluconazole from proniosomal gel prepared from span 20 (F2) was lower than span 60 proniosomal gel (F1); however, proniosomes prepared from a mixture of span 60 and tween 80 showed a greater decrease in the in vitro release of fluconazole. The least amount of fluconazole released was observed with proniosomal formula containing only tween 80 (F3), and it may be attributed to the hydrophilic nature of surfactant. The proniosomal gel formulation (F4) which prepared from span 60, tween 80 (1:1), and cholesterol showed the highest EE% and a significant in vitro prolonged release of drug at P < 0.05, and it was chosen as best formula. The slower release of fluconazole from proniosomal gel formulations compared to control gel may be due to drug encapsulation into vesicles providing prolonged drug release rate. The proniosomal gel (F3) gave a significant lowest drug release at P < 0.05 among the tested formulations (about 21.85% ± 5.32% after 6 H). The selected proniosomal gel (F4) showed a significant prolonged drug release at P < 0.001 which was 40.52% ± 8.25% after 6 h, in comparison to the control which released 99.8% ± 5.11% of fluconazole within 4 h [Figure 3]. This could be related to the condensed vesicular structure composed of span 60, tween 80, and cholesterol, which is considered a great barrier to drug diffusion and a retardant to its release. Thakur et al. obviated that the delayed release of proniosomal gel formulations is due to the slow release of drug from proniosomes and this may be attributed to the need of proniosomes for a time to be hydrated to form niosomal vesicles before starting release of drug across the cellophane membrane.[31] Thus, the formulation exhibited zero-order release over this period. Gupta et al. attributed this fact as the molecules of spans 60 and 20 are in an ordered gel state at the in vitro permeation condition of 25°C.[9]
Figure 3: In vitro release profile of fluconazole-loaded proniosomes

Click here to view


Transmission electron microscope

High-resolution transmission electron micrographs showed that the investigated proniosomal formula (F4) was nanosized, as shown in [Figure 2]. Micrographs showed that the proniosomal particles were smooth, spherical, and homogenous nanovesicles and revealed the formation of well-defined spherical vesicles with sharp boundaries. They formed an enclosed bilayer because it has amphiphilic nature with physical agitation and some energy such as instance heat which facilitates to form this structure.[32]

Physical stability studies

In the present study, stability studies were performed on the selected formulation. It was stored at 4°C ± 1°C for 6 months and observed for the change in %EE, average PS of the vesicles, and ZP. It was observed that there was no change in the physical appearance as there was neither change in the formulation consistency nor aggregation of vesicles. Furthermore, there was no significant change at P > 0.05 in EE%, PS, and ZP of fluconazole proniosomal gel after the storage for 6 months [Table 3]. Our findings were in accordance with the study done by Sandeep et al. who explained the nonsignificant change in size and EE% in span 60 surfactant-based formulation due to its high phase transition temperature and low permeability.[11] This result showed the high stability and suitability of proniosomal gel for the topical fluconazole delivery.
Table 3: Particle size, zeta potential, and percentage entrapment efficiency determined for the selected fluconazole proniosome formulation when fresh and after storage in the refrigerator for 6 months at 4°C

Click here to view


Microbiological study of fluconazole proniosomal gel

The in vitro antifungal efficacy of fluconazole pronisomal gel was determined by performing agar-cup diffusion assay. The microbiological study was carried out for (F4) proniosomal gel, plain (proniosome gel without drug) and control (fluconazole in 2% hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose (HPMC) gel formula). The diameter of zone of inhibition (ZI) obtained with the three groups was shown in [Figure 4]. F4 showed ZI of 5.3 cm compared to ZI of 4.2 cm obtained for the control gel while there were no ZI for the plain gel after 48 h. The explanation for the significant increase of ZI at (P < 0.05) of F4 is that ZI largely depends on the solubility and diffusion of the fluconazole through the agar media and exert its fungistatic effect against C. albicans, by inhibiting the cytochrome P-450-dependent enzyme lanosterol demethylase which is required for the conversion of lanosterol to ergosterol.[33] The obtained results revealed that the developed proniosomal gel was more efficient when compared to the control (2% HPMC gel). [Figure 5] shows a comparison between the mean values of inhibition zones of fluconazole proniosome gel (F4), control and plain gel after 48 h. Results indicate that F4 exhibits maximum antifungal activity after 48 h. This proniosome gel acts as carriers for drug delivery to the particular site of action; the antifungal activity is created by the drug incorporated in the proniosome gel.
Figure 4: Zone of inhibition of fluconazole (a), control gel, (b) plain, and (c) proniosome gel (F4) after 48 h

Click here to view
Figure 5: Comparison between the mean values of inhibition zones of fluconazole proniosome gel (F4), control, and plain gel after 48 h

Click here to view



  Conclusion Top


Fluconazole-loaded proniosomal gel was prepared successfully by coacervation phase separation method. The prepared proniosomal gel exhibited an entrapment efficiency of fluconazole ranged from 97.6 to 85.1 and PSs were in the nanosize range (21. 4–50.12 nm). It was found that ZP of F4 which chosen as a best formula according to entrapment efficiency, PS, and in vitro release study was found to be (−32.9 mV), that showed its stability. Micrographs revealed the formation of smooth and round niosomal vesicle after hydration. It was found that F4 exhibits maximum antifungal activity after 48 H which revealed that the developed proniosomal gel was more efficient when compared with the control (2% HPMC gel).

It was found that F4 which contains a mixture of span 60 and tween 80 (1:1) is the most appropriate surfactant mixture for the preparation of proniosomes. In vitro release studies proved that the prepared proniosomal gel contains fluconazole considered to be a successful topical drug delivery system and provide a sustained release of encapsulated drug, which can be further proved by the future in vivo and bioequivalence studies. Furthermore, there was no significant change in EE%, PS, and ZP of fluconazole proniosomal gel after storage for 6 months.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Hanan El laithy, dean of Faculty of Pharmacy, MSA University, for her support and Dr. Wafaa Khalaf, lecturer of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Azhar University, for her assistance in the microbiological experiment.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Dhandore SG, Wagh KB. Formulation and evaluation of fluconazole gel by using synthetic polymer. PharmaTutor 2018;6:27-31.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Nivoix Y, Levêque D, Herbrecht R, Koffel JC, Beretz L, Ubeaud-Sequier G, et al. The enzymatic basis of drug-drug interactions with systemic triazole antifungals. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008;47:779-92.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Van Thiel DH, George M, Moore CM. Fungal infections: Their diagnosis and treatment in transplant recipients. Int J Hepatol 2012. Article ID: 106923, doi:10.1155/2012/106923.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pierce CG, Srinivasan A, Uppuluri P, Ramasubramanian AK, López-Ribot JL. Antifungal therapy with an emphasis on biofilms. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2013;13:726-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Radha GV, Rani TS, Sarvani B. A review on proniosomal drug delivery system for targeted drug action. J Basic Clin Pharm 2013;4:42-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Yasam VR, Jakki SL, Natarajan J, Kuppusamy G. A review on novel vesicular drug delivery: Proniosomes. Drug Deliv 2014;21:243-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Mainardes RM, Urban MC, Cinto PO, Khalil NM, Chaud MV, Evangelista RC, et al. Colloidal carriers for ophthalmic drug delivery. Curr Drug Targets 2005;6:363-71.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Blazek-Welsh AI, Rhodes DG. Maltodextrin-based proniosomes. Aaps Pharmsci 2001;3:1.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Gupta A, Prajapati SK, Balamurugan M, Singh M, Bhatia D. Design and development of a proniosomal transdermal drug delivery system for captopril. Trop J Pharm Res 2007;6:687-93.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Mokhtar M, Sammour OA, Hammad MA, Megrab NA. Effect of some formulation parameters on flurbiprofen encapsulation and release rates of niosomes prepared from proniosomes. Int J Pharm 2008;361:104-11.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sandeep G, Vasavi Reddy D, Devireddy SR. Formulation and evaluation of fluconazole pro-niosomal gel for topical administration. J Appl Pharm Sci 2014;4:98-104.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rao M, Kadam M, Rao S. Formulation and evaluation of topical formulation for cutaneous tuberculosis. J Drug Deliv Ther 2018;8:102-16.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Moustafa MA, El-Refaie WM, Elnaggar YS, Abdallah OY. Gel in core carbosomes as novel ophthalmic vehicles with enhanced corneal permeation and residence. Int J Pharm 2018;546:166-75.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Abd-Elbary A, El-laithy HM, Tadros MI. Sucrose stearate-based proniosome-derived niosomes for the nebulisable delivery of cromolyn sodium. Int J Pharm 2008;357:189-98.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Sentjurc M, Vrhovnik K, Kristl J. Liposomes as a topical delivery system: The role of size on transport studied by the EPR imaging method. J Control Release 1999;59:87-97.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Madan JR, Ghuge NP, Dua K. Formulation and evaluation of proniosomes containing lornoxicam. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2016;6:511-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Gupta M, Tiwari S, Vyas SP. Influence of various lipid core on characteristics of SLNs designed for topical delivery of fluconazole against cutaneous candidiasis. Pharm Dev Technol 2013;18:550-9.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
ElMeshad AN, Mohsen AM. Enhanced corneal permeation and antimycotic activity of itraconazole against Candida albicans via a novel nanosystem vesicle. Drug Deliv 2016;23:2115-23.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wagh VD, Deshmukh OJ. Itraconazole niosomes drug delivery system and its antimycotic activity against Candida albicans. ISRN Pharm 2012;2012:653465.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Patel TB, Patel TR, Suhagia BN. Preparation, characterization and optimization of microemulsion for topical delivery of itraconazole. J Drug Deliv Ther 2018;8:136-45.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kibbe AH, editor. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excepients. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Pharmaceutical Association; 2000. p. 511-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Aboelwafa AA, El-Setouhy DA, Elmeshad AN. Comparative study on the effects of some polyoxyethylene alkyl ether and sorbitan fatty acid ester surfactants on the performance of transdermal carvedilol proniosomal gel using experimental design. AAPS PharmSciTech 2010;11:1591-602.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hao Y, Zhao F, Li N, Yang Y, Li K. Studies on a high encapsulation of colchicine by a niosome system. Int J Pharm 2002;244:73-80.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Guinedi AS, Mortada ND, Mansour S, Hathout RM. Preparation and evaluation of reverse-phase evaporation and multilamellar niosomes as ophthalmic carriers of acetazolamide. Int J Pharm 2005;306:71-82.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Alsarra IA, Bosela AA, Ahmed SM, Mahrous GM. Proniosomes as a drug carrier for transdermal delivery of ketorolac. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005;59:485-90.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Wen MM, Farid RM, Kassem AA. Nano-proniosomes enhancing the transdermal delivery of mefenamic acid. J Liposome Res 2014;24:280-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Junyaprasert VB, Teeranachaideekul V, Supaperm T. Effect of charged and non-ionic membrane additives on physicochemical properties and stability of niosomes. AAPS PharmSciTech 2008;9:851-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Basiri L, Rajabzadeh G, Bostan A. A-tocopherol-loaded niosome prepared by heating method and its release behavior. Food Chem 2017;221:620-8.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Abd-Elal RM, Shamma RN, Rashed HM, Bendas ER. Trans-nasal zolmitriptan novasomes:In vitro preparation, optimization and in vivo evaluation of brain targeting efficiency. Drug Deliv 2016;23:3374-86.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Pankaj S, Rini T, Dandagi P. Formulation and evaluation of proniosome based drug delivery system of the antifungal drug clotrimazole. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotechnol 2013;6:6-12.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Thakur R, Anwer MK, Shams MS, Ali A, Khar RK, Shakeel F, et al. Proniosomal transdermal therapeutic system of losartan potassium: Development and pharmacokinetic evaluation. J Drug Target 2009;17:442-9.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Rahman SA, Abdelmalak NS, Badawi A, Elbayoumy T, Sabry N, El Ramly A, et al. Formulation of tretinoin-loaded topical proniosomes for treatment of acne:In vitro characterization, skin irritation test and comparative clinical study. Drug Deliv 2015;22:731-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Rao M, Kamble P. Formulation and evaluation of antifungal proniosomal gel for oral candidiasis. J Drug Deliv Ther 2018;8:291-301.  Back to cited text no. 33
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
   Results and Disc...
  Conclusion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1486    
    Printed38    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded278    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal